The arguments between conventional and organic production seem to always continue. However the question is does either system have all the answers?

Perhaps we may all have to climb out of our trenches and shake hands for the future of the agricultural industry. And I'm talking about going further than simply accepting the existence of an organic market and putting in some field margins. I am also talking about going further than producing for a niche market and feeling morally right.

Obviously we want to create a living from farming but also as a society we want healthy, affordable food with a healthy, thriving environment, long-term. Depending on which side of the fence you are on, you may not be convinced that one or other system will produce any of these aims.

But how about pulling down the fence and both sides getting together to help each other achieve all aims? Perhaps we could have min-tilled fields of wheat that are genetically modified, but are also varietal populations, bi-cropped with clover and sprayed with compost tea?

GM may horrify organic advocates, but it could (after a rigorous testing and approval process) reduce chemical and fertiliser inputs and deliver health benefits. And wouldn't a splash of glyphosate reduce organics' carbon footprint?

---